Oscar Winners 2015

Birdman wins 4 awards:

  • Best Picture
  • Directing (Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu)
  • Cinematography (Emmanuel Lubezki)
  • Writing (Original Screenplay)

The Grand Budapest Hotel wins 4 awards:

  • Production Design
  • Original Score (Alexandre Desplat)
  • Costume Design
  • Makeup and Hairstyling

Whiplash wins 3 awards:

  • Actor in a Supporting Role (JK Simmons)
  • Sound Mixing
  • Film Editing

Other Awards:

  • Actor in a Leading Role: Eddie Redmayne, The Theory of Everything
  • Actress in a Leading Role: Julianne Moore, Still Alice
  • Actress in a Supporting Role: Patricia Arquette, Boyhood
  • Best Animated Feature: Big Hero 6
  • Writing (Adapted Screenplay): The Imitation Game
  • Short Film (Animated): Feast
  • Short Film (Live Action): The Phone Call
  • Visual Effects: Interstellar
  • Documentary (Short): Crisis Hotline: Veterans Press 1
  • Documentary (Feature): Citizenfour
  • Best Foreign Language Film: Ida
  • Sound Editing: American Sniper
  • Original Song: Glory, Selma
Posted in 2014, 2015, awards, lists, Oscar Winner | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Oscar Predictions 2015

I’ve been very lazy about posting reviews this year, but I have watched most of the Oscar-nominated movies. I wanted to keep up with my traditional Oscar prediction post at the very least! So here goes.

First, the stats from previous years:

2012: 9/12 correct, 12/12 including the “Could Upset” predictions
2013: 10/12 correct, 11/12 including the “Could Upset” predictions
2014: 12/14 correct, 13/14 including the “Could Upset” predictions

Predictions for 2015:

Best Picture
Will Win: Birdman
Could Upset: Boyhood

Actor in a Leading Role
Will Win: Michael Keaton, Birdman
Could Upset: Eddie Redmayne, The Theory of Everything

Actress in a Leading Role
Will Win: Julianne Moore, Still Alice
Could Upset: Marion Cotillard, Two Days, One Night; or Reese Witherspoon, Wild

Directing
Will Win: Richard Linklater, Boyhood
Could Upset: Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, Birdman

Actor in a Supporting Role
Will Win: JK Simmons, Whiplash
Could Upset: Edward Norton, Birdman

Actress in a Supporting Role
Will Win: Patricia Arquette, Boyhood
Could Upset: Laura Dern, Wild

Best Animated Feature
Will Win: How to Train Your Dragon 2
Could Upset: Song of the Sea

Cinematography
Will Win: Emmanuel Lubezki, Birdman
Could Upset: Ryszard Lenczewski and Lukasz Zal, Ida

Production Design
Will Win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
Could Upset: Mr. Turner

Writing (Original Screenplay)
Will Win: Birdman
Could Upset: The Grand Budapest Hotel

Writing (Adapted Screenplay)
Will Win: Whiplash
Could Upset: The Imitation Game

Music (Original Score)
Will Win: Hans Zimmer, Interstellar
Could Upset: Johann Johansson, The Theory of Everything

Short Film (Animated)
Will Win: The Dam Keeper
Could Upset: Feast

Short Film (Live Action)
Will Win: Aya
Could Upset: The Phone Call

Posted in awards, lists, Opinion, predictions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Imitation Game

I envy the people who will watch Benedict Cumberbatch for the first time in The Imitation Game. There may well be very few such people left in 2014 – because we seem to be in the Cumberbatch phase of human civilization. His turn as Alan Turing is a searing performance of extraordinary nuance and heartbreaking sensitivity, and he rises above the film and stands head and shoulders above his co-stars, many of whom are just along for the ride.

Its not fair to say that he is typecast – because he has picked roles across a range of subjects and characters. But the thing about Benedict Cumberbatch is that he cannot hide his brilliant intellect and radiance. There’s something about him that lends itself well to the eccentric geniuses he plays. In this film, he doesn’t portray the character as much as he inhabits it, with mannerisms, glances, and half-smiles, saying much more than the scope of his dialogue. One of my favorite moments in the movie is when Turing encounters a group of children on a train, and notices one boy sitting quietly, engrossed in his own task with utter disregard to the other boys cavorting around him. Turing’s remains outwardly aloof and indifferent, but he can’t hide his fleeting smile. At this point we haven’t yet learnt much about Turing’s own childhood, but with that smile, we know that he was much the same as he was growing up – a bit of a misfit.

If I’m raving too much about Benedict Cumberbatch and not enough about the movie, its not just because I am a staunch “Cumberbitch”. Its also because without him, the movie is simply functional. Held together well with a taut screenplay, a coterie of efficient actors and timely edits to interlace wartime footage with the movie at hand, the movie does a good job of bringing period detail and the important moments of Turing’s life to screen. But it rises above the ordinary purely on the strength of his performance.

There are two noteworthy aspects of the movie, though. Alexandre Desplat’s score, while reminiscent of the composer’s previous work, is wonderfully evocative and apt for the movie. The cinematography is beautiful too, capturing the lovely, muted light of the British countryside. Turing likes to go on long, gruelling runs, and there is a moment when he gazes into the horizon at the end of a particularly punishing stretch. Such moments are perfectly captured and one feels an affinity for the character that is beyond the empathetic performances.

One wishes the movie were a bit more aggressive though. While Turing’s personality is aloof to the point of being off-putting, many of the truths about his character are discovered off camera. For example, the fact that he has been soliciting sexual favors from men is flippantly thrown out by a policeman referring to the incident and calling him a pouf. The difficult decision he makes in choosing hormonal treatment over imprisonment, which ultimately leads to his tragic end, is also conveyed after the fact, albeit in a powerfully acted sequence from Cumberbatch.

The movie should garner him an Oscar nod, and perhaps he will win, except he has stiff competition from Steve Carrell for Foxcatcher. It is one of his most sensitive and tender portrayals of the many geniuses he has played.

My rating: 4/5

Posted in awards, Drama, Oscar contender | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Frank

I’m in two minds about this movie. On one hand, its delightfully quirky and features some powerhouse performances from Michael Fassbender and Domhnall Gleeson. On the other, it seems to perpetuate the idea that mental illness is somehow linked to creativity. I’m all for allowing people their quirks and eccentricities, but the movie seems oddly indulgent of a crazy bunch of misfits who are all hanging out together but not achieving much at all. In a practical world, would this sort of existence yield them sustenance? Fassbender is the star and redeeming factor for the movie – pitch perfect in his role of a enigmatic musical genius with his head perpetually hidden underneath a papier mache mask. It is proof of his acting prowess that even without giving us access to his facial expressions, he is able to etch a larger-than-life character who becomes instantly identifiable through voice, posture and movement. He emotes beautifully, whether composing an ode to an errant carpet strand, or wryly saying his facial expressions aloud to help Jon understand what he’s thinking, or being incredibly anal about the number of times the band has to rehearse their album before he feels they’re ready to begin recording.

Domhnall Gleeson is Jon, a drifter and wannabe songwriter, who, after a chance encounter, gets invited to moonlight as the keyboardist for pretentiously avant garde and honestly crap-sounding punk band The Soronprfbs. Nobody gets their music, including the musicians themselves, but they all rally around their messiah-like lead singer and guiding spirit Frank, played by Fassbender. There’s Scoot McNairy as the band manager, who was also an ex-guitarist, with his own problems. An intense, but largely silent and irrelevant, couple play the drummer and guitarist respectively, with the latter spewing French lines with noteworthy venom. And then there’s Maggie Gyllenhaal is Clara, slinking around in silk robes and looking pained as she ekes screeching notes out of her theremin, most pretentious of them all and looking frankly irritated with the whole concept. I read somewhere that Gyllenhaal had initially refused the role before she decided to take it up. If you ask me, she looks as if she never forgave herself for changing her mind. 

Jon wants to bring some form of public support and acclaim to the band, and is adept at manipulating social media to garner some interest. In his naive earnestness and quest for elusive creative genius, he donates his nest egg to the band, and one would think its perfectly fair to allow him to have some say in the future of the band. However, The Soronprfbs are the antidote to every punk rock band ever – they don’t really make good music, they have nothing much to say through their songs, and they don’t want to get famous. At least, not everyone. Frank, channelling The Lizard King in his stage antics and spoken word poetry, begins to trust Jon and believes him when he says they are talented, have a fan base and can get famous. Clara resents Jon intensely and is fiercely protective of Frank, believing that the whole farce of a public performance will be his undoing. As it turns out, she is right, and Frank’s fake head is not so much a marketing gimmick as an effort to hide himself away from the outside world. 

The end takes too long to come, and by the time it does, you already know where its going. What started as a lighthearted comedy, quickly takes a grim turn and becomes quite predictable, losing whatever quirky charm it had in the process. It should really have ended when Frank takes off into the great American unknown, after his argument with Jon. That would have left it slightly more open-ended and still sent the message the director wanted to. But, ultimately, Frank proves that too much of a good thing is also bad. 

My Rating: 3/5 (For Fassbender’s fantastic performance)

Posted in 2014, Drama | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Only Lovers Left Alive

This is a film about vampires, but its so far away from the genre that it defies it altogether. Its a mood piece, a film to fall into headlong and revel in its exquisite visual artistry, uber cool soundtrack and hipster characters. Pop culture references abound – and by pop culture, I mean the elegant cultural references that define our civilization, and not the post-digital age references. Our protagonists are, after all, several centuries old and have rubbed shoulders with Byron, Shelley and even Eddie Cochran, and one of their closest friends is Christopher Marlowe, who wrote all of what Shakespeare put out as his own work.

There is only the sliver of a story, and for the most part, it is about hanging out with our elegant, cooler-than-cool vampire duo – Adam (Tom Hiddleston), a rock star for the ages, reclusive and melancholy, surrounding himself with scratchy vinyls and vintage guitars, composing hypnotic, dirge-like symphonies on retro recording equipment and spewing Einsteinisms with his world-weary intonation; and Eve (Tilda Swinton), all gorgeous bed hair and suave beige leather, an eccentric aristocrat who lives for her books, recognizes mushrooms by their latin names, speaks in a lazy, amused drawl, but nevertheless has a more pragmatic and optimistic world view, and urges Adam to live on for nature, surviving things, nurturing friendship, kindness and dancing. Their love story has a restrained, careful quality to it, like the love that endures after the initial euphoria has dispersed, an intimacy and tenderness borne of decades of togetherness. They are together, even when apart – Adam inhabits a splendid Victorian ruin of a mansion in Detroit, and Eve lives in the golden by-alleys of Tangier, until she decides to visit Adam to uplift his “suicidal romantic” tendencies. They sleep the day away, spend their nights driving Adam’s battered Jaguar through the streets of Detroit’s urban desolation, marveling at Jack White’s home and an old abandoned theater, playing chess while discussing literary greats. They have given up predation, which Eve dismisses as “so fucking 15th century”, and instead get their fix from packaged “good stuff” – Type O-Negative – that are sourced by, in Adam’s case, a droll Jeffrey Wright playing a doctor named Watson, and in Eve’s case, by her beloved Kit Marlowe. This is not so much from reasons of civilized progress but from a fear of contamination – indeed, throughout the film, humans are treated with snobbish disdain, for bringing chaos into their worlds and being out of control. Adam and Eve are old souls, having had the time to observe the progress of humankind with a wry, detached humor, and now looking for reasons to wake up every night and keep going. When you’ve lived through the Middle Ages, Tartars and Inquisitions, and seen the rise and fall of Copernicus, Newton, Galileo and Tesla, what do you find interesting anymore?

The film opens with a delightful spiraling shot, interspersing Eve and Adam in their decadence and a spinning 7-inch 45 rpm vinyl record playing a moody, slowed down, souped up version of Wanda Jackson’s Funnel of Love. (Aside: I repeat, any movie that opens with such fabulous music has got to be fabulous too – reference The Lincoln Lawyer and Guy Ritchie’s RockNRolla). With the song, the camera spirals down, down onto the reclining figures of these supremely aloof beings. The rest of the soundtrack is tonally apt and just as crucial to the film as the stars themselves, composed by Jozef Van Wissem, in collaboration with Jim Jarmusch, the director himself. The soundtrack also features a hauntingly beautiful song by Lebanese singer Yasmin Hamdan, which causes Adam to experience an epiphanic moment of self-realization. The music perpetuates the feeling of timelessness and poignant beauty created by the film.

Everything in the film is to be savored, and the sluggish pace allows this indulgence. Even the names of the characters provide interesting reflections. Adam and Eve could be the biblical Adam and Eve, plagued by Ava as the snake in their dystopian garden, but I think they are closer to the quirky characters immortalized in Mark Twain’s The Diary of Adam and Eve. They also take on several pseudonyms through the film – Eve goes by Fibonacci and Daisy Buchanan, and Adam is called Faust, Dr. Strangelove, Caligari and Stephen Dedalus. Much of the humor is dry and delivered deadpan, though Tilda Swinton gets most of the interesting lines. “I like what you’ve done with the place,” is one of my favorites.

Nothing much happens with the story – except for a very slight dramatic tension introduced by Ava, Eve’s wild-child sister, played by Mia Wasikowska. The loveliness of the film comes from its verbal interaction and lush production design. The prevailing mood of languor and sensual pleasure is derived from the fabulous surroundings that the lead characters curate for themselves and a near-mythic atmosphere brought to life by abandoned streets, glowing, surreal lighting, and decadent shots of the couple, all entangled alabaster limbs and sinuous grace, sleeping in glorious abandon or twirling dervish-like in dazed enjoyment of music. This is cinematic pleasure at its purest – I was absolutely floored by the movie and wouldn’t be surprised if it went on to become a cult classic.

My rating: 5/5 (Hiddleston explaining the theory of entanglement? Please)

Posted in 2014, Drama, Oscar contender | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Maleficent

We’ve all heard the story of Sleeping Beauty, and as far as princesses go, Aurora was always a particularly passive one. She smiled and rejoiced at flowers and butterflies, pricked her finger on a needle as someone else prescribed she should do, and lay around waiting for a handsome prince to wake her with a kiss. When I tell stories to my three-year old niece, I’m always uncomfortable promising her handsome princes and happily ever afters. So far I’ve been trying to balance the fairy tales with stories of Daenerys and her dragons, or Jurassic Park, so her imagination can be sparked by other things besides tiaras, fluffy dresses made of gossamer and gauze, and an endless waiting for handsome princes.

Maleficent, then, is a tremendous attempt at reimagining the fairy tale, with a story that gives you a complex, conflicted female character who calls the shots, is betrayed, makes mistakes and then tries to put them right. And this character isn’t even the princess. This is the story of Sleeping Beauty that I’d prefer to tell my niece.

This is the origin story of the evil witch Maleficent, who, in the original Disney rendering, appeared out of nowhere, unexplainably miffed with a tiny baby, cursed her inexplicably, and then proceeded to make herself generally a nuisance. One never rooted for Maleficent in that story, but one wondered, nevertheless, what made her do the things she did. The focus was always on Aurora, as an ethereal, pure character, who did exactly what she was told and loved everybody, and in the end, won the prince.

Angelina Jolie is the anchor of the film, revelling in the fantastic flights and the power of her wings, delivering lines with her particular brand of sexy cool, looking down her nose and yet seeming vulnerable. Maleficent in the original was already an iconic villain, but Jolie deepens the role and adds emotional breadth that makes the character heroic and strong. None of the other actors are worth mentioning, except perhaps Sam Riley, who plays Maleficent’s devoted sidekick, the raven-human Diaval. Sharlto Copely, as King Stefan, is particularly over the top, and I don’t even remember the Prince’s face, who, thankfully for all feminist aunts everywhere struggling for story fodder with their nieces, is completely irrelevant to the tale. Elle Fanning, as Aurora, looks radiant but her character reminds me most of a younger, more scatterbrained version of Radagast.

In the world of movies, Maleficent is not particularly good. It comes loaded with special effects and CGI cinematography which look spectacular, but the script is full of holes and decides to lapse into Disney slapstick in the middle which takes away from the darkness of the beginning. Some images would be disturbing and confusing for children, but the middle section with the three silly fairies (meant to be adorable, but essentially just creepily senile) is meant entirely to make kids giggle. Add to that the collective “awww” from the audience when baby Aurora smiles at Maleficent even when she tries to scare her. This strikes an odd chord because the movie seems unclear about who its primary audience is. The climax seems taken from a completely different movie altogether, and while it is larger than life and serves as a final victory for Maleficent, intelligent adult movie goers will shake their heads in frustration.

In the end, I enjoyed the movie for giving us a different version of the classic damsel in distress tale, and for Angelina Jolie.

My rating: 3/5

Posted in 2014, adaptation, commercial, disney | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Transcendence

Memento. Batman Begins. The Dark Knight. The Dark Knight Rises. The Prestige. Inception. What’s common? Hah, you scoff. Easy question. Christopher Nolan! Know what else is common? Wally Pfister! What, you say. Who is that? The director of photography! Remember the fabulous cinematography of those movies? They made the movies as good as they are. That’s some resume! So what does Wally Pfister do next? Oh, he decides to direct a movie. He borrows a few ideas, watches a few TED conferences, throws in some technological mumbo jumbo, ropes in exactly the kind of star cast that will draw people to the theater – Johnny Depp, Morgan Freeman, Paul Bettany – and calls it Transcendence. But what’s the one thing he probably did not do? Ask Chris Nolan to take a look before he unleashed himself on the unsuspecting public.

Well, Nolan is the executive producer on this film, but its hard to believe he did anything except sign the checks. Because if Chris Nolan had made Transcendence, or even paid some attention, it would have been something else entirely. Even if he didn’t immediately fire the scriptwriter and write it himself, he could still have made something happen with this poor excuse of a screenplay. As it is, Wally Pfister is a bull in the china shop of post-cyberpunk apocalyptic science fiction.

Its especially frustrating because at the core of the film is a very important, relevant debate. What happens when technology intermingles so closely with humanity that artificial intelligence surpasses human reasoning power? We are on the brink of just such a event, as our devices become increasingly embedded in our lives, increasingly intelligent, capable and nearly sentient. In fact, the movie had a great teaser campaign: they released three point-of-view trailers – one, Dr. Caster’s vision for transcendence in Depp’s voice, two, a vision for self-aware artificial intelligence in Morgan Freeman’s voice (which was epic just by virtue of having Freeman voice it), and third a case for the flip-side of sentient technology voiced by Kate Mara, one of the leaders of RIFT (Revolutionary Independence from Technology). Honestly the teasers were much better than the film.

The film starts well, and sets us up for the ultimate clash between technology and humanity. But once the monster has been created, Wally Pfister has no idea what to do with it. He abandons all logic and goes overboard in spectacular fashion. There are super humans who can’t be killed, rainstorms caused by nanobots which have apparently perfected the art of cloud seeding, and super surgeries that could put Wolverine to shame in terms of regeneration and healing wounds, disease and disabilities. The RIFT movement fails to make its case strongly enough – in fact, Bree (Kate Mara) makes an elevator speech about it but her story about a machine that thought it was a monkey and screamed for it to end doesn’t spark any sympathy. The movie even makes a desperate attempt at an open ending (because that’s what Chris Nolan would do, right?). The only remarkable thing is, in the middle of this seminal battle for the future of mankind, no one called the President before pulling the plug on the internet.

Unfortunately for us, we’ll have to wait for Christopher Nolan to make this movie all over again, so we actually enjoy it.

My rating: 2/5 (2 hours of Johnny Depp and Morgan Freeman should count for something!)

Posted in 2014, action thriller, commercial, science fiction | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Inside Llewyn Davis

I watched this on an airplane, and for once I think the small flickering screen in the uncomfortable intimacy of a cramped, dimly lit airplane cabin made the film that much more melancholic and atmospheric. Llewyn Davis is a good-but-not-great folk singer, trying to hit out on his own after the tragic end to his partnership with another singer. The film spans one week in his life, as he crashes his friends’ homes, takes a road trip to Chicago, offends half a dozen people, and generally gives up in his search for elusive success in the only thing he can do well – sing. One of the best things about the film is its star Oscar Isaac and his plaintive voice as he sings mournful ballads and love songs in moodily lit, smoky pubs and taverns.

Truly, it appears the only redeeming quality about Llewyn Davis is his voice. He is irresponsible, selfish, unkind, and suffers from a perpetual chip on his shoulder caused by the self-conscious pride of an unsuccessful artist and his dismissiveness of others. He is dependent on the charity of others, and yet never really expresses true gratitude. Even his love affairs are clandestine, messy things, with one of his ex-lovers Jean (played by Carey Mulligan) spewing rage and hatred at him. And yet, one feels an affinity for Llewyn and his futile search for success. We understand his pain and perhaps this comes through when he sings – especially the opening song, “Hang Me, Oh Hang Me”, and the parting song he sings for his father, “The Shoals of Herring”.

In true Coen Brothers style, the film is darkly comic. One great example of their distinctive style is the road trip Llewyn undertakes with a pair of unlikely companions – a supercilious and sarcastic jazz musician and philosopher and his taciturn driver. The setting is a harsh, unforgiving winter, the time a lost capsule in the early 1960s when the purity of noncommercial folk music was subtly shifting. Most poignant is the last scene, where Llewyn gets off stage after singing Fare Thee Well, and is outside getting beaten up over another of his self-sabotaging mistakes, and is replaced on stage by another folk singer, singing the same song, with an instantly recognizable silhouette and distinctive voice – Bob Dylan.

Inside Llewyn Davis is a film that leaves you with a dull ache in your heart, a quiet resonance with the hopelessness of life, and its self-effacing heroes who keep going, like Llewyn keeps singing, in his heartbreak and despair. A fabulously made, tone-perfect film that is a must watch for music Iovers.

My rating: 5/5

Posted in 2013, awards, Drama, musical, Oscar Nominee | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Oscar Winners 2014

Gravity wins 7 awards:

  • Directing (Alfonso Cuaron)
  • Cinematography (Emmanuel Lubezki)
  • Original Score (Steven Price)
  • Visual Effects
  • Sound Mixing
  • Sound Editing
  • Film Editing

12 Years A Slave wins 3 awards:

  • Best Picture
  • Actress in a Supporting Role (Lupita Nyong’o)
  • Writing (Adapted Screenplay)

Dallas Buyers Club wins 3 awards:

  • Actor in a Leading Role (Matthew McConaughey)
  • Actor in a Supporting Role (Jared Leto)
  • Makeup and Hairstyling

The Great Gatsby wins 2 awards:

  • Production Design
  • Costume Design

Frozen wins 2 awards:

  • Best Animated Feature
  • Original Song

Other Awards:

  • Actress in a Leading Role – Cate Blanchett, Blue Jasmine
  • Writing (Original Screenplay) – Spike Jonze, Her
  • Short Film (Animated) – Mr. Hublot
  • Short Film (Live Action) – Helium
  • Documentary (Short) – The Lady in Number 6
  • Documentary (Feature) – 20 Feet from Stardom
  • Best Foreign Language Film – The Great Beauty, Italy
Posted in 2014, awards, lists, Oscar Winner | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Oscar Predictions 2014

It’s that time of year again! I’m going to try and predict which way the wind will blow, come Oscar night, while the ballots have been cast and all that’s needed is to show up or tune in.

My stats with Oscar predictions so far are not bad.

2012: 9/12 right, 12/12 including the “Could Upset” predictions
2013: 10/12 right, 11/12 including the “Could Upset predictions

Importantly, that was because there were clear forerunners in both years. In 2012, The Artist juggernaut was unstoppable. In 2013, we were clear about the respective merits of Life of Pi, Argo and Lincoln, and there wasn’t much scope of ambiguity. This year, however, the race is much closer, with no clear forerunner that would help with predictions. I’m also expanding my scope to include the short film categories, so my accuracy could suffer a bit. However, I think I understand the Academy propensities for each category pretty well, having watched the ceremony closely for several years.

So, here goes:

Best Picture
Will Win: 12 Years A Slave
Could Upset: Gravity

Actor in a Leading Role
Will Win: Matthew McConaughey, Dallas Buyers Club
Could Upset: Chiwetel Ejiofor, 12 Years A Slave. But because he’s tried so hard, it could also be the year for Leonardo DiCaprio for Wolf of Wall Street. My vote is still for McConaughey for his tremendous transformation and heartfelt performance.

Actress in a Leading Role
Will Win: Cate Blanchett, Blue Jasmine
Could Upset: Amy Adams, American Hustle

Directing
Will Win: Alfonso Cuaron, Gravity
Could Upset: any of the others really, but because I have to pick one, I’d say David O Russell or Steve McQueen.

Actor in a Supporting Role
Will Win: Jared Leto, Dallas Buyers Club
Could Upset: Barkhad Abdi, Captain Phillips

Actress in a Supporting Role
Will Win: Lupita Nyong’o, 12 Years A Slave
Could Upset: Jennifer Lawrence, American Hustle

Best Animated Feature
Will Win: Frozen
Could Upset: I don’t think there’s even a remote possibility that Frozen will not win. But just to pick one, The Wind Rises

Cinematography
Will Win: Emmanuel Lubezki, Gravity
Could Upset: Bruno Delbonnel, Inside Llewyn Davis

Production Design
Will Win: The Great Gatsby
Could Upset: American Hustle

Writing (Adapted Screenplay)
Will Win: 12 Years A Slave
Could Upset: Philomena

Writing (Original Screenplay)
Will Win: Spike Jonze, Her
Could Upset: American Hustle

Music (Original Score)
Will Win: Alexandre Desplat, Philomena
Could Upset: Thomas Newman, Saving Mr. Banks

Short Film (Animated)
Will Win: Get a Horse!
Could Upset: Mr. Hublot

Short Film (Live Action)
Will Win: Helium
Could Upset: The Voorman Problem

Posted in 2013, 2014, awards, lists, Opinion, predictions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment